Com dados da CPI da Covid, ABJD faz nova denúncia contra Bolsonaro no Tribunal Penal Internacional

Foto: Marcos Corrêa-PR Acesse o documento em português e inglês Com base em fatos novos levantados pela CPI da Covid, a Associação Brasileira de Juristas pela Democracia (ABJD) protocolou nesta terça-feira, 09, no Tribunal Penal Internacional (TPI), um adendo onde pede que a Corte dê seguimento à representação realizada em abril de 2020. A intenção é que seja investigada a denúncia feita pela entidade contra Jair Bolsonaro por cometimento de crimes humanitários contra a população brasileira ao assumir a opção de imunidade de rebanho, com boicote ao programa de vacinação e negação das políticas de cuidados sanitários .  De acordo com os juristas, a sistematização de dados produzidos pela CPI da Covid e por vários pesquisadores revelam o empenho e a eficiência da atuação do presidente e da União em prol da ampla disseminação do vírus no território nacional. “As normas produzidas, decretos e vetos a leis votadas no Congresso, os discursos e atos de Bolsonaro foram determinantes para

Bolsonaro denounced for a crime against humanity before the International Criminal Court

The President of Brazil is considered to be “putting the lives of the population at risk” by ignoring the WHO recommendations regarding COVID-19. Image: Tv Brasil

The criminal complaint (read here) against the President of Brazil, Jair Bolsonaro, was filed today, April 3, by the Brazilian Association of Jurists for Democracy (ABJD, in its english acronym) with the International Criminal Court (ICC) for committing crimes against humanity.

According to the attorneys who filed the petition, Ricardo Franco Pinto (Spain) and Charles Kurmay (United States), Bolsonaro's actions were done: “for the purpose of minimizing the seriousness of COVID-19 and encouraging activities that can only result in the rapid and uncontrolled spread of this deadly illness. These violations of international criminal law deserve the attention of the International Criminal Court to protect the lives, health and well being of millions of people living in Brazil and throughout the world. Statistical projections demonstrate that there will be more than 1 million deaths in Brazil if the WHO recommendations are not met.”

The ABJD requests that the International Criminal Court initiate an investigation into the President’s alleged conduct and indict him for putting the lives of millions of his citizens at risk of illness and death pursuant to Article 7 (1) (k) of the Rome Statute.

Violation of sanitary measures

The complaint describes that the president has attemped to minimize the severity of the pandemic while violating the recommendations of health authorities around the world, especially the guidelines of the WHO and those of all nations that were or are at the epicenter of the pandemic through:

a. His official speeches that call for the immediate end of social isolation and return to activities in schools and shops;
b. His official propaganda campaign "Brazil cannot stop";
c. His personal and physical participation in public events that generate crowds;

d. His Decree that that churches and lotteries should reopen when it is not safe to do so.

As stated in the criminal complaint, Mr. Bolsonaro through his actions has “substantially endanger[ed] the physical health and well-being of the Brazilian population, exposing them to a lethal virus which has the capacity to swallow the population whole, as already has been seen in several countries. Countries that have neglected the quarantine policy are where the impact of the pandemic has proved to be greatest, as in Italy, Spain and the United States”.


According to the ABJD, Bolsonaro has and continues to commit the crime of epidemic, established in article 267 of the Brazilian Penal Code and in Law number 8.072 / 1990, which provides for atrocious crimes, in addition to violating the preventive sanitary measure, as established in article 268 of the Penal Code. The President also has violated Law number 13,979, of February 6, 2020, which deals specifically with the emergency of Covid-19 and inter-ministerial decree number 05, of March 17, 2020, which establishes in its articles 3 and 4 that the failure to comply with the isolation and quarantine measures, as well as the resistance to submit to medical examinations, laboratory tests and specific medical treatments can lead to sanctions according to articles 268 and 330 of the Penal Code.

The complaint forcefully states that: “Indeed, it is the President of the Republic of Brazil who violates all of these laws by encouraging people to return to their jobs, children to return to schools, young people to return to universities and all others to move normally through the streets. All of this will lead to the infection of thousands upon thousands of people and the death of thousands more due to the confusion that the President himself creates”.

For this reason, the members of the Association complain that Mr. Bolsonaro as a Head of State and the Executive Branch of Brazil’s Government despises health and scientific authorities that recommend an effective strategy to reduce the effects of the pandemic and to save as many lives as possible because Mr. Bolsonaro finds their recommended safety measures inconvenient and harmful in the short term to the Brazilian economy.

Thus, ABJD complains that “The President of Brazil, echoing unscrupulous businessmen, has stubbornly refused to adopt the world standard of combating the pandemic, social confinement. Thus, Brazil due to the actions of President Bolsonaro ceases to participate in the strategy to flatten the infection curve. Rather, he seeks to expand it. Bolsonaro’s conduct inevitably will cause the health system in Brazil to collapse”.

International Criminal Court

The Rome Statute guides the actions of the International Criminal Court and is included in the Brazilian legal system after its approval in the National Congress (Decree 4.388 / 2002). By incorporating the regulations, the country accepts that there are crimes that directly affect thousands of people globally, causing profound rejection of humanity.

Article 27.1 of the Rome Statute establishes that the immunity of the head of state does not exempt him from his criminal responsibility nor does it represent a reason for reducing his sentence. The immunity of the office does not prevent the Court from exercising its jurisdiction either.

Brazil not only ratified the Rome Statute, but included it in its 4th paragraph to article 5 of the 1988 Federal Constitution, recognizing the country's submission to the jurisdiction of the International Criminal Court.

Thus, the ABJD affirms that it has no doubt about the legitimacy and competence of the International Criminal Court to process its complaint. In addition, the Association shows that members of the Brazilian federal prosecutor's office had already tried to get the Attorney General of the Republic - the only authority that could sue the president in the country - to convince Bolsonaro to refrain from continuing with actions that put population at risk from a serious epidemic; however, the request was shelved and no action was taken.

“To our knowledge, Brazil is the only country in the world that has a Head of State who advocates against the legal determinations of his own country and that of international health organizations, putting the Brazilian population at grave risk (due to the effect and harmful impact of its attitudes towards the general public, who will not know whom to obey, putting themselves at serious risk)”, it adds.

“As has been said many times, the raison d'être of the ICC is to combat impunity. To date, because President Bolsonaro has been able to act with relative impunity he has been emboldened to commit the crimes discussed herein and at present there is absolutely nothing to deter him from continuing to do so”, concluding that “The attitudes of Bolsonaro and his government are leading Brazil to a humanitarian crisis which is as lethal as any genocide, crime against humanity, or war crime that has come before this International Criminal Court”.